Filtered results
- 9 results found
- (-) Industry
- Clear filter
Sort by
Companies have significant influence over public discourse in online platforms, necessitating that the algorithms that shape these online platforms should be regulated and constrained to sufficiently consider the public interest (Susskind, 2018: 350).
The aim of the first three modules of KT4D’s Social Risk Toolkit thus focuses on the individual aspects of this challenge and is multifaceted.
The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of how AI, big data and frontier technologies impact rights from the data protection perspective.
The policy brief published by KT4D suggests that examining culture allows for a deeper understanding of societal responses to AI development.
The current EU approach to AI regulation faces several challenges and limitations that need to be addressed.
Since our liberal democracies generally employ forms of representativeness to their institutions, the impact of AI on free and fair elections is also one of the key ways in which technology affects our polities.
There are both instrumental and intrinsic reasons to value democracy. In short, democracy is valuable instrumentally because:
(1) democracy can assist us in producing laws and policies that protect the rights and interests of citizens,
Knowledge technologies, as distinct from information technologies, have been defined in the Module C of the social risk toolkit.