Filtered results
- 7 results found
- (-) Culture
- (-) Inclusion/Exclusion
- (-) Privacy
- Clear filter
Sort by
The experimental component of Module A aims to further characterise internet users' behaviours when faced with online choices potentially undermining their autonomy: how people evaluate AI-generated information and/or content selected through AI-based algorithms, and how people are influenced by
The aim of the first three modules of KT4D’s Social Risk Toolkit thus focuses on the individual aspects of this challenge and is multifaceted.
The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of how AI, big data and frontier technologies impact rights from the data protection perspective.
The policy brief published by KT4D suggests that examining culture allows for a deeper understanding of societal responses to AI development.
The current EU approach to AI regulation faces several challenges and limitations that need to be addressed.
Since our liberal democracies generally employ forms of representativeness to their institutions, the impact of AI on free and fair elections is also one of the key ways in which technology affects our polities.
There are both instrumental and intrinsic reasons to value democracy. In short, democracy is valuable instrumentally because:
(1) democracy can assist us in producing laws and policies that protect the rights and interests of citizens,