Companies have significant influence over public discourse in online platforms, necessitating that the algorithms that shape these online platforms should be regulated and constrained to sufficiently consider the public interest (Susskind, 2018: 350).

The aim of the first three modules of KT4D’s Social Risk Toolkit thus focuses on the individual aspects of this challenge and is multifaceted.

This document examines autonomy as a form of agentive control grounded in attention regulation, goal-directed action, and reflexivity.

The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of how AI, big data and frontier technologies impact rights from the data protection perspective.

The policy brief published by KT4D suggests that examining culture allows for a deeper understanding of societal responses to AI development.

The current EU approach to AI regulation faces several challenges and limitations that need to be addressed.

This document adopts a psychological and cognitive perspective on misinformation and disinformation, focusing on the interaction between cognitive biases, emotional motivations, social communication goals, and contemporary information environments